Wednesday, September 23, 2009

The New Guy Gets It

Say what you will, Al Franken is trying to protect our Constitutional Rights against Unreasonable Search and Seizure, while Obama is trying to get sections of the (SPIT) Patriot Act extended.

Good on ya dude.
The Patriot Act gutted our Constitution and is anathema to a free society.


Al Franken Reads the 4th Amendment to Justice Department Official


Just in case he wasn’t familiar with it, Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) decided to read the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution to David Kris, assistant attorney general of the Justice Department’s National Security Division, who was testifying to the Senate Judiciary Committee today to urge reauthorization of expiring provisions of the USA Patriot Act.

snip

Noting that he received a copy of the Constitution when he was sworn in as a senator, he proceeded to read it to Kris, emphasizing this part: “no Warrants shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

“That’s pretty explicit language,” noted Franken, asking Kris how the “roving wiretap” provision of the Patriot Act can meet that requirement if it doesn’t require the government to name its target.


snip

Excerpts from an article in The Washington Independent by Daphne Eviatar.

H/T Rawstory for the link.

I can haz my fucking rights back now?

UPDATE;

Russ Fiengold rips this guy a new asshole too, when he finds out that the "Sneek And Peek" provision has been used for drug enforcement 760 time out of 763.
That's THREE times they have used the Patriot Act provision to break into peoples homes without a warrant in their War on Terror, actually looking for terrorists!

Found via Huffpo, go read this,

WATCH: DoJ Official Blows Cover Off PATRIOT Act


In the debate over the PATRIOT Act, the Bush White House insisted it needed the authority to search people's homes without their permission or knowledge so that terrorists wouldn't be tipped off that they're under investigation.

Now that the authority is law, how has the Department of Justice used the new power? To go after drug dealers.

Only three of the 763 "sneak-and-peek" requests in fiscal year 2008 involved terrorism cases, according to a July 2009 report from the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts. Sixty-five percent were drug cases.

Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) quizzed Assistant Attorney General David Kris about the discrepancy at a hearing on the PATRIOT Act Wednesday. One might expect Kris to argue that there is a connection between drug trafficking and terrorism or that the administration is otherwise justified to use the authority by virtue of some other connection to terrorism.

He didn't even try. "This authority here on the sneak-and-peek side, on the criminal side, is not meant for intelligence. It's for criminal cases. So I guess it's not surprising to me that it applies in drug cases," Kris said.

"As I recall it was in something called the USA PATRIOT Act," Feingold quipped, "which was passed in a rush after an attack on 9/11 that had to do with terrorism it didn't have to do with regular, run-of-the-mill criminal cases. Let me tell you why I'm concerned about these numbers: That's not how this was sold to the American people. It was sold as stated on DoJ's website in 2005 as being necessary - quote - to conduct investigations without tipping off terrorists."

Kris responded by saying that some courts had already granted the Justice Department authority to conduct sneak-and-peeks. But Feingold countered that the PATRIOT Act codified and expanded that authority -- all under the guise of the war on terror.

Feingold, the lone vote against the PATRIOT Act when it was first passed, is introducing an amendment to curb its reach. "I'm going to say it's quite extraordinary to grant government agents the statutory authority to secretly break into Americans homes," he said.




Dirty sonsabitches.

3 comments:

  1. Busted, need to ask you something off line, how can I do that?

    laruepork@netzero.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. BustednucklesAT gmail.com, fire away.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So why not just REPEAL the fargin patriot act?

    ReplyDelete