I was struck by the verbiage that went with this absolute fucking violation of my fourth amendment rights when it came to me," I have seen this before somewhere".
Remember this?
..."You do not have any reasonable expectation of privacy in your own".. insert what the fuck ever they want to attack at this point.
Do you remember where you first saw that quote now?
It was when President Ronald Fucking Reagan was in charge and the Supreme court at the time decided you have a "reasonable expectation of privacy".
Still having problems putting two and two together?
Can you say Random Drug Testing?
That's right,
Until recently, I was subject to random drug testing because I was in a job that was considered to be a public safety area, ie; the trucking industry.
OK, you don't wan't me to be stoned out of my gourd and doing a brake job on a fucking heavy truck. I get that.
But....
Read this and tell me how many fucking ways from Sunday my rights have been violated by the last two administrations.
Other privacy rights are contained in criminal statutes. For example,Here is my source for my dissent of what I consider to be a completely illegal information gathering system by the Federal fucking government.
- surreptitious interception of conversations in a house or hotel room is eavesdropping. See e.g., N.Y. Penal §§ 250.00, 250.05
- one has a right of privacy for contents of envelopes sent via first-class U.S. Mail. 18 USC § 1702; 39 USC § 3623
- one has a right of privacy for contents of telephone conversations, telegraph messages, or electronic data by wire. 18 USC § 2510 et seq.
- one has a right of privacy for contents of radio messages. 47 USC §605
- A federal statute denies federal funds to educational institutions that do not maintain confidentiality of student records, which enforces privacy rights of students in a backhanded way. 20 USC § 1232g. Commonly called the Buckley-Pell Amendment to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. See also Krebs v. Rutgers, 797 F.Supp. 1246 (D.N.J. 1991); Tombrello v. USX Corp., 763 F.Supp. 541 (N.D.Ala.1991).
- Records of sales or rentals of video tapes are confidential. 18 USC §2710
- Content of e-mail in public systems are confidential. 18 USC § 2702(a).
- Bank records are confidential. 12 USC §3401 et seq.
- library records are confidential in some states. e.g., N.Y. CPLR § 4509; Quad/Graphics, Inc. v. Southern Adirondack Library Sys., 664 N.Y.S.2d 225 (N.Y.Sup.Ct. 30 Sep 1997).
So, on top of all the shit I consider to be infringements on my God given rights,these are absolutely forbidden by the Fourth amendment and yet these fucking cocksuckers are twisting the obvious and plainly written law of the land to fit their fucked up Corporate masters designs to cram the citizens of this country into a fucking 72 Pinto on a parking lot of a Day laborers 7-11 store front so we can all beg for a fucking job, at minimum wage.
Fuck you, fuck them and fuck that.
Our rights have taken a beating lately that would land you in a fucking ambulance and a trip to a death panel emergency room because you have no motherfucking insurance and it is no drive by, they are doing it intentionally and incrementally.
Hey, guess what?
Fuck you!
If a fucking cop decides he needs to plant a GPS unit on my truck in the middle of the night and says I have a "reasonable expectation of privacy"?
Guess what?
So do you motherfucker.
Pray I don't find it.
It's bad enough I have to actually tell you out loud that I have the right to remain silent.
Get the fuck off my lawn asshole.
Something about probable cause and warrants sworn to by the accuser I have the right to see face to face.
Damn, this country has gone FUBAR in the last couple of years in a fucking hurry.
So, I have to put up a no trespassing sign that you will fucking ignore anyways because I don't have an electronic gate with a fucking remote and don't have six foot high walls around the place I fall down at night and call home?
Keep it coming you ignorant cock suckers.
The laws you keep perverting are already being ignored by every one except the jack booted thugs you are trying to empower.
The rest of us are busy trying to make a living so we can eat.
You are going to fuck around and find yourselves on the wrong end of an angry mob one of these days and that fancy fucking gate out front is going to be the first thing you see on your front porch, followed by a big assed truck full of very angry fellow citizens.
I would imagine they might be quite uncompromising, unlike you.
LMAO!!
ReplyDeleteYou must be an extremely tolerant lady and I just love ya already.
Smooch.
Busted, I shudder to think just how far things have to go before that mob puts down the cheetos and grabs their pitchforks. George Orwell is spinning in his grave...
ReplyDeleteIt's getting close to that time Mayberry. When our side goes along with this shit it's very bad!
ReplyDeleteFigures that the decision was part of a DEA case. Drugs are still the worst scourge our country faces at the moment and we must expend all effort & resources to track down the dread offenders... The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is usually more progressive than that decision - was surprised when I read of it. The Patriot Act took an industrial strength shredder to our rights; since then they've figured out how to cross cut, too.
ReplyDeleteIf there's no right to privacy in our driveways, surely there's no such right parked in a public street, or in a parking garage. That's where we bug them back.
ReplyDeleteNext surveillance trick to watch out for is "no expectation of privacy for your windows". This would be using a laser beam to watch the vibrations your window makes as you talk inside your own home.